Heading offshore for a corporate advantage
With Russian business renowned for its use offshore companies Business RT spoke with Anna Smirnova, Lawyer in GSL Law & Consulting, about the factors prompting the use of offshore companies.
Публикация
RT: What are the attractions for Russians of using offshore companies?
AS: “The offshore concept has emerged in the middle 1980-s in the Anglo-Saxon world (to date, the great majority of offshore jurisdictions are still the British dependent territories and members of the Commonwealth). The absence of taxation in the country of incorporation, relatively confidential treatment of the company owner’s info, no requirement to prepare financial statements of the company, – all these make offshore corporations one of the most popular vehicles, employed by the western businesses.
Russian companies, which entered the European and worldwide markets in 1990 – 2000, had to deal with the fact that there were certain “game rules” to follow. Incorporation of companies in foreign jurisdictions made it possible for Russian entrepreneurs to widen the geographical horizons for their businesses, to increase the number of export and import agreements and the volume of the funds received from overseas investors, to achieve positive trade balance, etc. The steep increase in the number of double taxation avoidance agreements, made by Russia in 1990 – 2000, played its vital role, too.
For sure, one cannot deny the fact that the availability of the new market vehicles lead inevitably to their excessive use by some members of business community. Nevertheless, the possibility to work with non-resident companies within the frames defined by the legislation has allowed Russian businesses to operate on external markets with greater convenience and facilitated the flow of overseas investments to Russia.”
RT: What industries and business sectors are more or less forced to open offshore companies and for what transactions?
AS: “The concept of the open market and the principle of business competition have inspired Russian businesses to strive for reducing their expenses to the low limit and to search the world market for the most beneficial offers. It means that Russian businesses have often had to tune their business practices to the requirements of their overseas partners and investors. Sometimes, the only way to meet those requirements is to incorporate a non-resident company. Let us draw some examples:
- in the majority of cases, Russian companies trading with China have to incorporate companies in Hong Kong and to make payments through them, for such is the requirement of their Chinese partners;
- Russian businessmen who enter into supply contracts and services contracts with the EU countries are to have a common European VAT-number and/or a customs number, available for EU-registered companies only;
- Russian companies, which attract major overseas investors and get ready for the IPO, have to organize their assets in a particular way, in order to provide for financial transparency of the business and to be able to prepare consolidated accounts for the audit under the IFRS; and for these purposes overseas holding companies come very handy.”
RT: Companies registered in Cyprus are very popular – why is this?
AS: "In answering this question, it would be worthwhile to mention two facts: firstly, Cyprus is not an offshore in its traditional meaning; secondly, the scope of popularity of Cyprus companies is not limited to Russian business environment, they are widely used by businesses from many other countries, including the EU members. The reasons for the popularity of Cyprus companies are fairly obvious:
- favorable tax treatment of businesses, which in the first instance is manifested through the lowest income tax rate in Europe, the 10%. There are other “bonuses”, for instance: no withholding tax on dividends, interests and royalty paid by a Cyprus company; the possibility to apply a zero capital gains tax rate under certain conditions; no regulations on thin capitalization and controlled foreign companies, a vast network of double taxation avoidance treaties.
- the incorporation procedure is relatively simple, and the requirements to the corporate structure are few. The government of Cyprus, just like in other countries of Anglo-Saxon law family, reduced its involvement in the corporate affairs to the minimum. In reality, it means that there are no legal restrictions regarding the directors or shareholders of a Cyprus company; neither there is a minimum authorized capital required by the laws of Cyprus. All this, combined with a simple “notice filing” procedure of a company incorporation and amendment of corporate documents, makes Cyprus rather a popular jurisdiction with the foreign investors, who appreciate the absence of unnecessary administration obstacles.
- Cyprus enjoys the status of a EU-member country, which means that Cyprus companies trade under the same customs rules, foreign exchange and antimonopoly laws and other EU Directives (e.g., the “VAT” Directive), as the other European countries. Thus, Cyprus companies may obtain common European customs numbers (EORI-number) and undergo VAT registration for obtaining an all-European VAT number.
- The requirement to prepare annual audited accounts enables the prospective investor or buyer to check the financial affairs of the company.
RT: How does the use of offshore companies complicate Russian corporate dealings?
AS: “Any legally-relevant actions of foreign companies in Russia are carried out within rules set by Russian law. Taking into account the general legal principle of non-discrimination this means that non-resident companies are governed by the same rules as Russian legal entities, except the cases specifically determined by law (for example, articles 306 – 312 of the RF Tax Code), which provide for deviation from ordinary business procedures and may result in extra costs and time.
Thus, entrepreneurial activity regularly carried on by a foreign entity in the territory of Russia in the cases determined by law will lead to the creation of a permanent establishment within the meaning of article 306 of the RF Tax Code, which is associated with additional administration costs for the accreditation of a representative office, tax registration and onward preparation and filing of accounts according to the rules set out for non-resident companies.
For Russian partners and counteragents of foreign companies, legal relations with non-resident companies may also create an obligation to act as tax agent in the remittance of certain types of income of a foreign entity and liability for failure to fulfill such obligation.
‘Technical’ difficulties may arise even with the paperwork formalizing the relationship between foreign and Russian companies due to the differences in regulation of internal corporate relations in the country of incorporation of a non-resident company and peculiarities of administration and document flow of foreign companies.”
RT: How does the interest in offshore companies reflect a lack of confidence in Russia’s legal and administrative systems?
AS: One of the obstacles the Russian entrepreneurs face when attracting foreign investments is that foreign banks and credit institutions doubt the efficiency of Russian law-enforcement and judicial system.
As a result, foreign banks investing in Russian economy agree to finance Russian businesses against pledge of inventories which are subject of export and import contracts (pre-financing practice) or against pledge of shares or participations in holding companies that hold Russian assets. However, non-Russian residency of such holding companies may be set by the bank as a mandatory condition for a loan-term credit. Similar conditions relating to transfer of Russian assets to non-resident companies more often than not are imposed by foreign investment firms as well. Thus, the interest of Russian businesses in foreign investors, on the one hand, and conditions set out by investors, on the other hand, constitute essential factors affecting the number of non-resident companies registered by Russians.
RT: How will Russian accession to WTO or increasing number of bilateral taxation arrangements affect the trend?
AS: “Today even major foreign economy experts do not venture to estimate all the consequences of Russia’s admission to WTO, but we dare say that harmonized pricing rules, IFRS, lower customs duties and other measures accompanying the implementation in Russia of common standards applied by WTO countries are more likely to boost the foreign operations of Russian entrepreneurs and demand for non-resident companies, than they are likely to cut this trend down. It is also worth noting that the existing list of WTO members already includes almost all leading economies of the world and some of the most popular offshore jurisdictions – Belize, Panama, St Kitts and Nevis, etc.
The growing number of double tax treaties and obligatory clause on tax information exchange and cooperation between tax authorities have long made fictitious the association with offshores of such concepts as ‘non-transparency’ or ‘confidentiality’ that exists in popular mind. Non-disclosure of identity of the ultimate beneficial owner of a business not only becomes an impossible, but often an undesirable consequence of incorporation in jurisdictions where corporate structure details cannot be requested from a public registry. To prove this point, we may remind that names of ultimate beneficial owners and chains of assets ownership of major Russian companies since long ago can be found in print, and this includes disclosures by beneficial owners themselves.”
Материалы по теме
-
08.10.2010 Семинар
“Какой оффшор удобней”. Выбор оптимальной юрисдикции. Сравнительные характеристики, практические рекомендации
-
08.10.2013 Вебинар +2
“Кипрская стрижка депозитов” в масштабах ЕС.
-
29.10.2013 Вебинар
“Так когда же мы получим свои деньги?”. На что в итоге могут рассчитывать вкладчики кипрских банков (Laiki и Bank of Cyprus), потерявшие свои средства во время кипрского кризиса
-
27.02.2022 Форум Фёдор 1
«Не та» подпись директора в договоре от имени кипрской компании
-
01.07.2015 Бумажные и Интернет СМИ Олег Попутаровский -1 +1
«Стрижка» депозитов на Кипре, последствия кипрского кризиса два года спустя: обращения в высшие судебные инстанции и возможные дальнейшие шаги и судебные перспективы
-
20.01.2020 Доклад Александр Алексеев
2020: EMI как альтернатива банкам. «Фичи» и «Лайфхаки». Платежные системы, эквайринг. Собственный опыт с 34 EMI. Процедура и минимальные требования, ограничения по бизнесу и по юрисдикциям, тарифы, КYС. Разбор кейсов.
-
09.12.2016 Форум Екатерина 19
CRS и офшоры
-
31.08.2017 Форум Маргарита 1
CRS: офшоры и аудит
-
21.06.2012 Бумажные и Интернет СМИ -1 +1
Cyprus international trusts: a technical analysis of the 2012 amended law
-
25.12.2013 Вебинар
Hermes Bank, Сент Лючия: Часть 2. Работа со счетом. Информация, основанная на практическом опыте клиента
-
21.01.2011 Доклад Александр Алексеев
Merchant Account: как открыть и сколько стоит. Интернет эквайеринг. Необходимые условия успешного использования он-лайн процессинга кредитных карт.
-
30.06.2022 Офферы
Payment Institution (PI) на Кипре.
-
05.08.2016 Форум Илья 1
Автоматический обмен
-
01.06.2016 Доклад Марина Волкова
Автоматический обмен информацией
-
22.11.2016 Форум Anton 1
Агентская схема для Кипра
-
12.08.2014 Форум Анна 1
Агентский договор
-
04.02.2016 Форум Роман +2 3
Административная и уголовная ответственность гражданина РФ – директора кипрской компании
-
20.09.2017 Книги, Монографии Капиталина Офшорова 1
Азбука оффшора
-
24.04.2019 Товары 1
Азбука оффшора
-
Актуальное налогообложение кипрских компаний. Последние изменения за 2015-2018 годы
-
22.12.2015 Семинар
Актуальные проблемы использования оффшоров в сделках с недвижимым имуществом
-
17.02.2014 Форум Альберт 7
Альтернатива Сейшелам
-
14.05.2022 Офферы
Альтернативные инвестиционные фонды на Кипре.
-
13.03.2017 Вебинар
Английская компания (UK Ltd) с отделением на Кипре (Cyprus Branch)
-
01.02.2008 Бумажные и Интернет СМИ Ольга Кутяева +3
Антиоффшор-регулирование в Российской Федерации: последние изменения законодательства и правоприменительная практика
-
21.01.2011 Доклад Сергей Панушко
Антиоффшорное противостояние в Российской Федерации: изменения в законодательстве и правоприменительной практике. Позиция налоговых и таможенных органов, судебная практика.
-
15.08.2007 Бумажные и Интернет СМИ Ольга Кутяева -1 +1
Антиоффшорное противостояние: изменения законодательства
-
18.03.2013 Бумажные и Интернет СМИ
Банковский кризис на Кипре: Хроника текущих событий, анализ, комментарии, перспективы
-
20.11.2013 Вебинар
Банковский сектор Кипра после Кипрского кризиса
-
13.11.2017 Форум Ираида 1
БВО – налоговая гавань?
-
01.08.2013 Бумажные и Интернет СМИ Ольга Кутяева -1 +1 1
Белизские оффшорные компании используются в налоговом планировании вопреки давлению ОЭСР
-
18.02.2016 Бумажные и Интернет СМИ Александр Алексеев -1 +1
Ближе к берегу, или как Российские банки используют в своей работе оффшоры
-
Борьба с «Treaty Shopping» по-русски. Противодействие использованию соглашений об избежании двойного налогообложения для минимизации налогов, планируемые изменения в НК РФ.
-
Британские Виргинские и Сейшельские острова: пристальный взгляд на самые популярные оффшоры. Сравнительные характеристики.
-
18.09.2008 Семинар
Британские Виргинские Острова. 1001 вопрос про это. Корпоративное законодательство: Изменения, правоприменительная практика, тенденции развития
-
16.11.2021 Семинар
Ведение бизнеса в ОАЭ. Решения по банковским счетам для работы в ОАЭ
-
02.08.2013 Форум Александр 1
Ведение торговой деятельности на рынке Форекс / Forex с использованием кипрской компании: корпоративные и личные налоговые последствия
-
22.05.2012 Семинар
Великобритания: Практические аспекты налогового планирования, обзор законодательства, новые инструменты, типовые схемы, судебная практика
-
18.02.2020 Бумажные и Интернет СМИ Ольга Кутяева -2 +2
Венгрия не офшор, но доходы по-прежнему облагаются невысокими налогами
-
17.07.2012 Вебинар +2
Верны ли слухи о будущей национализации кипрского банка Laiki Bank? (часть 2)
-
10.03.2011 Доклад
Взаимодействие итальянских компаний и их зарубежных партнеров: Налоговые, таможенные и иные аспекты.
-
06.11.2012 Бумажные и Интернет СМИ Олег Попутаровский -1 +2
Власти Кипра: в наших банках нет грязных российских денег
-
03.03.2014 Форум Ярослав +1 4
Внесение акций Российских компаний в уставный капитал Кипрской компании с целью дальнейшей перепродажи: возможные налоговые риски
-
16.07.2012 Вебинар
Возмещение НДС (VAT) на Кипре: Методология, Практика, Нюансы
-
14.05.2015 Форум Николай 1
Возможно ли с соблюдением требований законности “завести” на Российскую компанию средства с Кипрской компании
-
24.09.2019 Форум Андрей 1
Возможно ли уменьшить НДФЛ в РФ на налоги, удержанные в США
-
03.10.2014 Форум Константин 5
Вопросы налогообложения “роялти”, выплачиваемых физическому лицу, а также некоторые вопросы администрирования кипрских компаний
-
02.05.2019 Форум Андрей
Вопросы насчет внесения в уставной капитал
-
12.03.2017 Форум Андрей +1 1
Выдача рублевого займа от зарубежного заимодавца в пользу российской компании-заемщика: основные аспекты и нюансы
-
03.07.2018 Форум Василий 10
Выплата дивидендов с оффшорной компании на счет в иностранном банке
Добавить комментарий